While CT has been celebrating institutions adopting ETH I've personally been watching institutions adopt @BungeeExchange Few see now. Then all will. @BungeeExchange, the on-chain liquidity layer for fintech, institutions & CEXes🫡

When fintech and exchanges come onchain they want ALL the assets that exist onchain thats why chain-abstraction and @SOCKETProtocol is critical proud to see @BungeeExchange be the liquidity-layer for @Gemini as they come onchain!

basically

The weirdest thing we do on here is reverse engineer the why behind decisions big orgs make on merit When mostly these decisions are made on: - relationships - risk taking ability of the PM - the “internal pitch” L1 is simply the most risk free, flexible, no vendor lockin method to do a chain

Check out the latest podcast episode of THE NETWORK PODCAST with @0xLamps! Angus went from 0 -> 1, being a biology grad without coding experience, to leading the largest liquidity bridge in the crypto space. Mandatory listening for anyone who wants to succeed in the game of life. topics: - Angus's background - Stargate V1 and V2 - Multichain protocol tokens - Stargate's success - Immutable smart contracts - Intent based architecture - Security at Stargate - Learning - Minimizing compuslive decision making - How Angus organizes his day - Favorite TV show - Two-choice questions YouTube link below

For a brief moment I thought institutions might not like EVM and might stick to what they are used to or hire for aka rust, java, javascript etc turns out not really, stripe, circle all are EVM based still dont know why

prediction-markets on SOCKET

feeling p uneasy and thinking more and more about AI oneshotting humans lately gotta be careful and not let the lines blur

I think about this alot Lots of people seem to intuitively believe that there exists a fast <> quality tradeoff -- but the fact is not really interesting that both @patrickc and Mr 50cent arrived at the same conclusion "Man, whoever said progress was a slow process wasn't talking about me, Im a P-I-M-P"

I hear alot of push back around chain-abstraction being -- we dont understand what it is We still dont know what an L2 is Its pretty well understood as a mission, maybe not well enough technically coz its not mature enough to categorise solutions yet Do we wait for a technical definition and argue about it on CT or do we focus on delivering our version of it? I guess it's clear.