Trending topics
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.

Adam Johnston
Senior Contributor @FDRLST | Words in @DailyCaller @theblaze @amacforamerica @amconmag
Here’s a U.S. State Department official admitting that mass immigration is designed to change the demographics of the United States.
Immigrants, especially from Latin America, overwhelmingly vote Democrat, and so Democrats decided to import a new electorate to secure permanent power.
h/t @Project_Veritas
174
The core of the Declaration of Independence is legal in substance, not philosophical, citing 27 violations of the colonists’ rights as Englishmen.
Though the founders were steeped in Enlightenment ideals, the pivot from appealing to “the rights of Englishmen” to “Natural Rights” was strategic.
If the conflict remained framed as a civil war between British subjects and Great Britain, with the colonists seeking the restoration of their “rights as Englishmen,” neither France or Spain would support the colonists.
Under the 18th-century Law of Nations, a monarch could not legally intervene in the "domestic affairs" of another sovereign.
Thomas Paine said as much in ‘Common Sense’:
“Under our present denomination of British subjects, we can neither be received nor heard abroad; the custom of all Courts is against us, and will be so, until by an independence we take rank with other nations.”

Tahmineh DehbozorgiDec 21, 2025
The claim that America is the organic product of a singular “Anglo-American Christian culture” misses the most important fact about the founding: the Revolution was an act of rejection of the “Anglo” part.
The Declaration of Independence is not a celebration of English lineage or inherited authority. It is literally an indictment of it. It rejects monarchy, hereditary rule, parliamentary supremacy, and the idea that rights flow from tradition, blood, or crown. Those were Anglo values—and the Founders broke with them deliberately.
Yes, America inherited the Anglo common law. But the common law became the most sophisticated legal system in the world because it was radically reworked in America—through written constitutions, judicial review, federalism, enumerated powers, and enforceable individual rights. None of that existed in England.
And this legal experimentation did not occur in a closed ethnocultural loop. It was carried out by generations of lawyers, judges, and thinkers—many of them immigrants or the children of immigrants—who fought for the constitutional principles.
What makes America exceptional is not which ethnic group the Founders were, but what they built: a system capable of binding strangers into a single people through law rather than lineage.
Reduce America to ancestry, and you reduce the Constitution to folklore. The Founders believed their ideas were universal—or they wouldn’t have risked everything to declare them so.
And here’s a photo of one of the greatest Americans, Marquis de Lafayette, who was famously not born in America.

168
“America must be kept American. For this I purpose, it is necessary to continue a policy of restricted immigration.”
- Calvin Coolidge, December 06, 1923


TheBlazeDec 23, 2025
TPUSA STRAW POLL shows a WHOPPING 90% of attendees support a full immigration moratorium:

198
Top
Ranking
Favorites
